2017 Evaluation of the New Building Canada Fund - Long text descriptions of figures

Figure 1: Summary of average physical condition rating

Figure 1 compares the condition ratings of 8 categories of infrastructure as very good, good, fair, poor or very poor as a percentage of total holdings. 

  • Roads: Very Good 26%; Good 37%; Fair 23%; Poor 9%; Very Poor 5%
  • Buildings: Very Good 22%; Good 33%; Fair 28%; Poor12%; Very Poor 5%
  • Sports and Recreation: Very Good 18%; Good 36%; Fair 27%; Poor 14%; Very Poor 5%
  • Potable Water: Very Good 36%; Good 35%; Fair 17%; Poor 9%; Very Poor 3%
  • Waste Water: Very Good 39%; Good 26%; Fair 24%; Poor 8%; Very Poor 3%
  • Storm Water: Very Good 44%; Good 33%; Fair 16%; Poor 5%; Very Poor 2%
  • Bridges: Very Good 17%; Good 57%; Fair 22%; Poor 3%; Very Poor 1%
  • Public Transit: Very Good 23%; Good 34%; Fair 26%; Poor 15%; Very Poor 1 %

Source of data: Canadian Infrastructure Report Card 2016

Return to Figure 1

Figure 2: Percent of Approved projects and Remaining Funding by Fiscal Year for Historic Programs and NBCF

Figure 2 presents the 2014-15 and 2015-16 percentage of approved projects and remaining funding across historic programs and NBCF:

  • BCF-CC in 2014-15 approved projects is 22%, and remaining funding is 5%; in 2015-16 approved projects is 4%, and remaining funding is 4%;
  • BCF-MIC in 2014-15 approved projects is 18%, and remaining funding is 9%; in 2015-16 approved projects is 1%, and remaining funding is 9%;
  • NIC in 2014-15 approved projects is 3%, and remaining funding is 98%; in 2015-16 approved projects is 0%, and remaining funding is 98%;
  • PTIC-NRP in 2014-15 approved projects is 17%, and remaining funding is 98%; in 2015-16 approved projects is 8%, and remaining funding is 90%;
  • PTIC-SCF in 2014-15 approved projects is 40%, and remaining funding is 98%; in 2015-16 approved projects is 87%, and remaining funding is 57%.

Source of data: Infrastructure Canada's Program Database, as of March 31st, 2017

Return to Figure 2

Figure 3: Percent of Remaining Funding for BCF-MIC and PTIC-NRP

Figure 3 compares the percentage of remaining funding for BCF-MIC and PTIC-NRP over a three year period, specifically:

  • BCF MIC funds remaining in Year 1 is 75%, Year 2 is 55%, and Year 3 is 72%;
  • PTIC-NRP funds remaining in Year 1 is 99%, Year 2 is 90%, and Year 3 is 33%.

Source of data: Infrastructure Canada Program Database, as of March 31st, 2017

Return to Figure 3

Date modified: