2014-2015
Departmental Performance Report
Supplementary Information Tables
- Details of Transfer Payment Programs of $5 Million or More
- Horizontal Initiatives
- Departmental Sustainable Development Strategy
- Status Report on Transformational and Major Crown Projects
- Response to Parliamentary Committees and External Audits
- Internal Audits and Evaluations
Details of Transfer Payment Programs of $5 Million or More
Infrastructure Canada manages the following Transfer Payment Programs Footnote 1
- Contributions under the Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund (CSIF);
- Contributions under the Border Infrastructure Fund (BIF);
- Contributions under the Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund (MIRF);
- Transfer Payments under the Gas Tax Fund (GTF);
- Transfer Payments under the Provincial-Territorial Infrastructure Base Fund (PT Base Fund);
- Contributions under the Building Canada Fund-Communities Component (BCF-CC);
- Contributions under the Building Canada Fund-Major Infrastructure Component (BCF-MIC);
- Contributions under the Green Infrastructure Fund (GIF);
- Contributions under the Inuvik to Tuktoyaktuk Highway Fund;
- Contributions under the New Building Canada Fund-Provincial-Territorial Infrastructure Component-National and Regional Projects (PTIC-NRP);
- Contributions under the New Building Canada Fund-Provincial-Territorial Infrastructure Component-Small Communities Fund (PTIC-SCF);
- Contributions under the New Building Canada Fund-National Infrastructure Component (NBCF-NIC); and
- Contributions under the National Recreational Trails Program.
Details of Transfer Payment Programs of $5 Million or More
Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund (CSIF):
Name of transfer payment program | Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund. (Payments under this program are voted). |
---|---|
Start date | 2003-2004 |
End date | 2018-2019 Footnote 2 |
Fiscal year for terms and conditions | 2011-2012 Footnote 3 |
Strategic Outcome | Public Infrastructure for a More Prosperous Canada |
Link to department's Program Alignment Architecture | Program 1.4: Large-Scale Infrastructure Investments |
Description | This program supports projects that sustain economic growth and enhance the quality of life of Canadians. Investments are made in cooperation with the provinces, territories, municipalities, and the private sector, and contribute to the construction, renewal and/or enhancement of public infrastructure. The Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund leverages additional contributions from other partners by providing up to 50 percent funding for eligible projects. Footnote 4 |
Results achieved | In 2014-2015, the Department continued to monitor and deliver the program with provincial and territorial partners and Transport Canada for the Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund: |
Comments on variances | Actual Spending in 2014-2015 was lower than originally projected, given that CSIF projects are large-scale and complex in nature, many unknowns may arise during the course of the fiscal year. These factors range from lower than anticipated project costs to project delays resulting from inclement weather and from technical and other construction-related complexities that also cause construction delays, which explain deviations of actual expenditures from the original forecast. |
Audits completed or planned | Internal audits of the Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund program were conducted in 2007-2008 and in 2012-2013. |
Evaluations completed or planned | A joint evaluation of the Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund and the Border Infrastructure Fund was completed in 2014-2015. A final evaluation of the Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund is planned for completion in September 2019. |
Engagement of applicants and recipients | All funding available for projects under this program has been committed. The Department continues to work with recipients to flow funding, including final payments and ensure that projects are closed. |
Performance Information (dollars)
Type of Transfer Payment | 2012–2013 Actual spending | 2013–2014 Actual spending | 2014–2015 Planned spending | 2014–2015 Total authorities available for use | 2014–2015 Actual spending (authorities used) | Variance (2014–2015 actual minus 2014–2015 planned) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total program |
239,189,191 |
196,634,325 |
251,695,831 |
251,695,831 |
233,373,467 |
(18,322,364) |
Total grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contributions |
239,189,191 |
196,634,325 |
251,695,831 |
251,695,831 |
233,373,467 |
(18,322,364) |
Total other types of transfer payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Border Infrastructure Fund (BIF):
Name of transfer payment program | Border Infrastructure Fund. (Payments under this program are voted). |
---|---|
Start date | 2003-2004 |
End date | 2017-2018 Footnote 5 |
Fiscal year for terms and conditions | 2011-2012 Footnote 6 |
Strategic Outcome | Public Infrastructure for a More Prosperous Canada |
Link to department's Program Alignment Architecture | Program 1.3: Investments in National Infrastructure Priorities |
Description | This program supports projects that sustain economic growth and enhance the quality of life of Canadians. Investments are made in cooperation with the provinces, territories, municipalities, and the private sector, and contribute to the construction, renewal and/or enhancement of public infrastructure. The Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund leverages additional contributions from other partners by providing up to 50 percent funding for eligible projects. Footnote 7 |
Results achieved | As of March 31, 2015, the federal government has announced support for 11 border improvement infrastructure projects, with a combined total investment of $1.2 billion for transportation systems that promote improvements in the efficiency and capacity at border crossings. |
Comments on variances | Transportation projects funded under the BIF are large and complex by nature which makes them at higher risk of experiencing unexpected delays during their implementation as was the case in previous year. Projects faced delays for various reasons including technical and other construction-related complexities. Those factors lead to delays in the disbursement of federal contributions which lags the actual construction of projects as recipients are reimbursed for incurred expenditures only once they submit claims. |
Audits completed or planned | An internal audit of the Management Control Framework of the Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund (CSIF) and the Border Infrastructure Fund (BIF) was completed in 2007-2008. An internal audit of Closing Programs (PT Based and BFF) is planned for completion in December 2017. |
Evaluations completed or planned | A joint evaluation of the Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund and the Border Infrastructure Fund was completed in June 2014-2015. |
Engagement of applicants and recipients | All funding available for projects under this program has been committed. The Department continues to work with recipients to flow funding, including final payments and ensure that projects are closed. |
Performance Information (dollars)
Type of Transfer Payment | 2012–2013 Actual spending | 2013–2014 Actual spending | 2014–2015 Planned spending | 2014–2015 Total authorities available for use | 2014–2015 Actual spending (authorities used) | Variance (2014–2015 actual minus 2014–2015 planned) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total program |
7,449,802 |
28,196,496 |
51,032,163 |
51,032,163 |
20,863,226 |
(30,168,937) |
Total grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contributions |
7,449,802 |
28,196,496 |
51,032,163 |
51,032,163 |
20,863,226 |
(30,168,937) |
Total other types of transfer payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund (MIRF):
Name of transfer payment program | Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund. (Payments under this program are voted). |
---|---|
Start date | 2004-2005 |
End date | 2014-2015 Footnote 8 |
Fiscal year for terms and conditions | 2010-2011 Footnote 9 |
Strategic Outcome | Public Infrastructure for a More Prosperous Canada |
Link to department's Program Alignment Architecture | Program 1.5: Infrastructure Investments in Smaller Communities and Rural Areas |
Description | This program supports small-scale municipal infrastructure projects designed to promote and improve quality of life in both urban and rural communities. The program initially provided $1 billion in federal funding and was augmented with an additional $200 million in Budget 2007. At least 80 percent of funding under the program has been dedicated to municipalities with a population of less than 250,000. For most projects, the MIRF provides up to one-third funding for eligible projects. Its long-term commitment to public infrastructure helps promote sustainable economic growth, innovation and healthy communities. Projects contribute to the construction, renewal and/or enhancement of public infrastructure to build capacity in partnership with recipients. It is delivered through a partnership with federal regional development agencies Footnote 10. |
Results achieved | The Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund program formally concluded on March 31, 2014 in most provinces and territories. Over the past year, Infrastructure Canada, in close collaboration with federal delivery partners, has been focusing its effort on program closeout activities. The closeout process has been implemented by Infrastructure Canada and its federal delivery partners over the past few years in order to have consistent and effective procedures to monitor the Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund program closeout. Partners are continuing to implement the closeout procedures. |
Comments on variances | Program spending in 2014-2015 was lower than planned. This can be attributed to a number of factors beyond the control of the funding recipient. Those factors such as inclement weather, geological challenges and technical delays and other construction-related complexities result in longer project timelines. |
Audits completed or planned | An internal audit of the Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund was completed in 2011-2012. |
Evaluations completed or planned | All program evaluations for the Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund were completed as of 2007-2008. |
Engagement of applicants and recipients | Contribution funding under this program has been fully committed. INFC is presently engaging with program recipients to ensure that funded infrastructure projects are completed and that the program is closed down. |
Performance Information (dollars)
Type of Transfer Payment | 2012–2013 Actual spending | 2013–2014 Actual spending | 2014–2015 Planned spending | 2014–2015 Total authorities available for use | 2014–2015 Actual spending (authorities used) | Variance (2014–2015 actual minus 2014–2015 planned) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total program |
35,296,905 |
42,337,674 |
24,744,902 |
9,410,559 |
9,410,559 |
|
Total grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contributions |
35,296,905 |
42,337,674 |
24,744,902 |
9,410,559 |
9,410,559 |
|
Total other types of transfer payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas Tax Fund (G10F):
Name of transfer payment program | Gas Tax Fund. (Payments under this program are statutory). |
---|---|
Start date | 2005-2006 |
End date | Ongoing Footnote 12 |
Fiscal year for terms and conditions | 2013-2014 Footnote 13 |
Strategic Outcome | Public Infrastructure for a More Prosperous Canada |
Link to department's Program Alignment Architecture | Program 1.2: Permanent and Flexible Infrastructure Funding |
Description | This program provides municipalities with predictable long-term funding, enabling construction and rehabilitation of core public infrastructure. The federal government has concluded renewed Agreements with provinces, territories, the Association of Municipalities of Ontario, the Union of British Columbia Municipalities and the City of Toronto for the permanent Gas Tax Fund, starting in 2014-2015.Gas Tax Fund Agreements establish an accountability framework allowing the Government of Canada to flow Gas Tax Fund money twice a year to signatories which, in turn, flow funds to municipalities based on an agreed-upon allocation formula. For their part, municipalities decide which projects to prioritize within established investment categories. In addition to supporting environmental objectives, the permanent Gas Tax Fund supports increased productivity and economic growth and strong cities and communities via an expanded list of eligible investment categories. Municipalities can pool, bank and borrow against this funding, providing significant additional financial flexibility. Eligible recipients are required to report annually on their use of funds and their compliance to terms and conditions of the Gas Tax Fund Agreements. As announced in Economic Action Plan 2013, the renewed Gas Tax Fund is now indexed at 2 percent per year, and will give municipalities greater flexibility to spend federal funding on a broader range of infrastructure priorities. |
Results achieved | During 2014-2015, all renewed Gas Tax Fund agreements were negotiated and signed, and annual funding letters were issued to each jurisdiction. By April 2015, $1.97 billion flowed to all provinces and territories under the Gas Tax Fund. |
Comments on variances | Funding letters issued to signatories are dependent on the submission and acceptance of an Annual Report (Financial Report Table, Project List) and an Independent Audit Opinion or Audit Based Attestation. In the absence of duly completed reports, Infrastructure Canada can withhold funding letters from recipients until such time that completed reports are accepted. In 2014-2015, the submission of 12 out of 13 reports explains the difference between planned and actual compliance level with regards to reporting requirements. |
Audits completed or planned | An internal audit of the Management Control Framework for the Gas Tax Fund was completed in 2009-2010. An internal audit of the Gas Tax Fund Management Control Framework is planned for completion in March 2018. |
Evaluations completed or planned | An evaluation of the Gas Tax Fund was completed in 2009-2010. A summative evaluation of the Gas Tax Fund was completed in July 2015. |
Engagement of applicants and recipients | With program design for the permanent GTF now approved, negotiations have been taking place with all jurisdictions to finalize bilateral agreements for the beginning of this fiscal year. The negotiations come on the heels of various engagement initiatives with provinces and territories, the initial recipients of GTF funds. Once agreements are in place, new funds from the permanent GTF can begin to flow, with the first allocation being transferred no later than July 15, 2014. |
Performance Information (dollars)
Type of Transfer Payment | 2012–2013 Actual spending | 2013–2014 Actual spending | 2014–2015 Planned spending | 2014–2015 Total authorities available for use | 2014–2015 Actual spending (authorities used) | Variance (2014–2015 actual minus 2014–2015 planned) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total program |
1,964,039,431 |
2,106,864,500 |
1,973,269,432 |
1,973,269,432 |
1,973,269,432 |
0 |
Total grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other types of transfer payments |
1,964,039,431 |
2,106,864,500 |
1,973,269,432 |
1,973,269,432 |
1,973,269,432 |
0 |
Provincial-Territorial Infrastructure Base Fund (PT Base Fund):
Name of transfer payment program | Provincial-Territorial Infrastructure Base Fund. (Payments under this program are voted). |
---|---|
Start date | 2007-2008 |
End date | 2016-2017 Footnote 14 |
Fiscal year for terms and conditions | 2013-2014 Footnote 15 |
Strategic Outcome | Public Infrastructure for a More Prosperous Canada |
Link to department's Program Alignment Architecture | Program 1.1: Funding for Provincial-Territorial Priorities |
Description | This program provides base funding to each province and territory for core infrastructure priorities. In addition, funding under the Building Canada Fund for the three territories is managed under this fund. The Provincial-Territorial Infrastructure Base Fund was designed to help restore fiscal balance while enhancing Canada's public infrastructure system. It also supports economic growth and productivity, and promotes a cleaner environment and prosperous communities. While payments are made to provinces and territories, ultimate recipients can also include local and regional governments or private sector bodies. In order for federal funding to flow, provinces and territories submit a list of infrastructure initiatives through a capital plan which must be accepted by the Minister of Infrastructure, Communities and Intergovernmental Affairs. Payments are made in advance and cost-sharing provisions apply to a capital plan as a whole, and not individual initiatives. Provinces and territories may pool, bank, or cash-manage these funds to give them flexibility in implementation. |
Results achieved | Following the acceleration of the Provincial-Territorial Infrastructure Base Fund (PT Base Fund) as part of the 2009 Economic Action Plan, all funds available under the Provincial-Territorial Infrastructure Base Fund ($2.3 billion) have been committed as of March 31, 2014. |
Comments on variances | Under the PT Base Fund, the Government of Canada's flow of funding to the provinces and territories is subject to the submission and federal acceptance of Capital Plans and/or Expenditure Reports. As reporting is cumulative, any delay in the submission of a given report will result in delays to subsequent reports, and related payments. In one jurisdiction, reporting is significantly behind resulting in four delayed payments. In addition, the final report must demonstrate that all PT Base Fund initiatives have been completed; however this requirement was not met by eight jurisdictions by the end of 2014-2015, thus delaying the submission of final reporting. |
Audits completed or planned | An internal audit of the PT Base Fund was completed in 2011-2012. An Audit of Closing Programs (PT Base and BIF) is planned for completion in December 2017. |
Evaluations completed or planned | An evaluation of the PT Base Fund was completed in 2012-2013. |
Engagement of applicants and recipients | The Department continues to work with jurisdictions to flow funding, including final payments, under the PT-Base Fund. |
Performance Information (dollars)
Type of Transfer Payment | 2012–2013 Actual spending | 2013–2014 Actual spending | 2014–2015 Planned spending | 2014–2015 Total authorities available for use | 2014–2015 Actual spending (authorities used) | Variance (2014–2015 actual minus 2014–2015 planned) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total program |
236,814,200 |
191,431,000 |
55,334,800 |
62,500,000 |
25,000,000 |
(30,334,800) |
Total grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other types of transfer payments |
236,814,200 |
191,431,000 |
55,334,800 |
62,500,000 |
25,000,000 |
(30,334,800) |
Building Canada Fund-Communities Component (BCF-CC):
Name of transfer payment program | Building Canada Fund-Communities Component. (Payments under this program are voted). |
---|---|
Start date | 2008-2009 |
End date | 2016-2017 Footnote 16 |
Fiscal year for terms and conditions | 2013-2014 Footnote 17 |
Strategic Outcome | Public Infrastructure for a More Prosperous Canada |
Link to department's Program Alignment Architecture | Program 1.5: Infrastructure Investments in Smaller Communities and Rural Areas |
Description | This program supports infrastructure needs of smaller communities with populations of less than 100,000. Project costs are shared with provincial, territorial and municipal governments, with each order of government generally contributing one-third of the eligible costs. The fund supports the construction, renewal, and enhancement of basic infrastructure such as potable water, wastewater treatment, local roads, and other infrastructure needs of small communities. Footnote 18 |
Results achieved |
|
Comments on variances | Program spending in 2013-2014 was lower than planned. This can be attributed to a number of factors beyond the control of funding recipients. These factors range from lower than anticipated project costs to project delays resulting from inclement weather and from technical and other construction-related complexities that can lead to construction delays, which in turn cause claims to lag and be submitted for reduced amounts. It is also important to note that the disbursement of federal contributions follows the actual construction of projects as recipients are reimbursed for incurred expenditures only once they submit claims. |
Audits completed or planned | An internal audit of the Building Canada Fund-Communities Component was completed in 2011-2012. |
Evaluations completed or planned | An evaluation of the BCF-CC was completed in July 2015. |
Engagement of applicants and recipients | The Department is working with partners and stakeholders to ensure timely completion of projects under the BCF-CC. |
Performance Information (dollars)
Type of Transfer Payment | 2012–2013 Actual spending | 2013–2014 Actual spending | 2014–2015 Planned spending | 2014–2015 Total authorities available for use | 2014–2015 Actual spending (authorities used) | Variance (2014–2015 actual minus 2014–2015 planned) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total program |
184,690,213 |
120,382,787 |
139,298,397 |
139,298,397 |
76,338,704 |
(62,959,693) |
Total grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contributions |
184,690,213 |
120,382,787 |
139,298,397 |
139,298,397 |
76,338,704 |
(62,959,693) |
Total other types of transfer payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Building Canada Fund-Major Infrastructure Component (BCF-MIC):
Name of transfer payment program | Building Canada Fund-Major Infrastructure Component. (Payments under this program are voted). |
---|---|
Start date | 2008-2009 |
End date | 2018-2019 Footnote 19 |
Fiscal year for terms and conditions | 2013-2014 Footnote 20 |
Strategic Outcome | Public Infrastructure for a More Prosperous Canada |
Link to department's Program Alignment Architecture | Program 1.4: Large-Scale Infrastructure Investments |
Description | This program targets larger infrastructure projects of national or regional significance. It increases overall investment in public infrastructure and contributes to broad federal objectives: economic growth, a cleaner environment and strong and prosperous communities. At least two-thirds of the funding is targeted to national priorities: water, wastewater, public transit, the core national highway system, and green energy. The Major Infrastructure Component has 12 additional eligible categories of investment, and priority projects are identified through discussions with provinces. By providing federal funding on a cost-shared basis, it leverages additional contributions from other partners to increase overall investment in infrastructure. Projects must be supported by a business case and undergo a federal review against key program criteria. Footnote 21 |
Results achieved | In 2014-2015, Infrastructure Canada and its federal delivery partners made progress in the implementation of the Building Canada Fund-Major Infrastructure Component: As of this fiscal period, a total of $7 billion in federal funding has been committed to 188 projects. Collaboration with federal delivery partners and stakeholders is effectively supporting program delivery. Nearly half (48%) of the projects are completed. The largest investments under the BCF-MIC by categories are as follows: public transit infrastructure, with a total federal investment of nearly $3 billion, and national highway system infrastructure, with a total federal investment of nearly $1.4 billion. The total number of projects completed by project proponents this fiscal year and, as a consequence, the total value of projects completed were lower than planned, as some of these large-scale and complex projects encountered delays and were not completed by year-end as forecast. Typically, project delays occur as a result of inclement weather and technical and other construction-related complexities that also cause construction delays. However, construction on these projects is ongoing and Infrastructure Canada will continue to monitor progress towards completion and reimburse recipients as claims are submitted. Program delivery policies and tools have been implemented to improve monitoring and reporting on the progress of the BCF-MIC. Monitoring of expenditures and forecasts has improved forecasting of expenditures under the program, which poses challenges due to the large scope of project investments and uncertainties around construction conditions. In addition, resources previously assigned to stimulus funding programs are now devoted to the delivery of the program in order to increase monitoring and due diligence capacity as Infrastructure Canada moves towards closure of the BCF-MIC in the next years. |
Comments on variances | This program provides significant funding for large, complex projects. It is typical for these projects to require a significant amount of upfront planning, design and procurement. These processes may occur, in whole or in part, after funding commitments are announced. As a result, there is often a period of time that will pass between project announcements and the start of construction. Even when construction has started, a number of factors beyond the control of funding recipients can result in lower spending than forecasted. These factors range from lower than anticipated project costs to project delays resulting from inclement weather and from technical and other construction- related complexities that also cause construction delays, which in turn cause claims to lag and be submitted for reduced amounts. It is also important to note that actual spending lags behind the actual rate of construction of projects since recipients are reimbursed only once claims are submitted, even though eligible costs may have already been incurred. |
Audits completed or planned | No audit has been conducted of this program. |
Evaluations completed or planned | An evaluation of the BCF-MIC is planned for completion in March 2017. |
Engagement of applicants and recipients | Although most funding has been committed, Infrastructure Canada continues to work with provinces to identify priorities for remaining funding. The Department also continues to work with recipients to flow funding, including final payments, and ensure that projects are closed. |
Performance Information (dollars)
Type of Transfer Payment | 2012–2013 Actual spending | 2013–2014 Actual spending | 2014–2015 Planned spending | 2014–2015 Total authorities available for use | 2014–2015 Actual spending (authorities used) | Variance (2014–2015 actual minus 2014–2015 planned) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total program |
919,764,212 |
692,803,945 |
706,677,090 |
706,639,377 |
538,025,504 |
(168,651,586) |
Total grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contributions |
919,764,212 |
692,803,945 |
706,677,090 |
706,639,377 |
538,025,504 |
(168,651,586) |
Total other types of transfer payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Green Infrastructure Fund (GIF):
Name of transfer payment program | Green Infrastructure Fund. (Payments under this program are voted). |
---|---|
Start date | 2009-2010 |
End date | 2020-2021 Footnote 22 |
Fiscal year for terms and conditions | 2013-2014 Footnote 23 |
Strategic Outcome | Public Infrastructure for a More Prosperous Canada |
Link to department's Program Alignment Architecture | Program 1.3: Investments in National Infrastructure Priorities |
Description | This program supports environmental infrastructure projects that promote cleaner air, reduced greenhouse gas emissions and cleaner water. Targeted investments in green infrastructure can contribute to improving the quality of the environment and a more sustainable economy over the longer term. There are five eligible categories of investment: wastewater infrastructure, green energy generation infrastructure, green energy transmission infrastructure, solid waste infrastructure, and carbon transmission and storage infrastructure. By providing up to 50 percent federal funding on a cost-shared basis, the fund leverages additional investments from other partners. Footnote 24 |
Results achieved | In 2014-2015, Infrastructure Canada made progress in the implementation of the Green Infrastructure Fund:
As of this fiscal period, a total of 20 projects have been funded under this program and $725 million in federal funding has been committed to these projects. In 2014-2015, $50 million in funding was announced for the PEI Transmission Project. As a result, all project funding available under the GIF has now been announced. |
Comments on variances | This program provides significant funding for large, complex projects. It is typical for these projects to require a significant amount of planning, design and procurement. These processes may occur, in whole or in part, after funding commitments are announced. Once contribution agreements for projects are signed with project proponents, the Government of Canada has a legal obligation to provide the committed funding in accordance with the terms of those agreements. |
Audits completed or planned | No audit has been conducted of this program. |
Evaluations completed or planned | An evaluation of the Green Infrastructure Fund is planned for completion in June 2016. |
Engagement of applicants and recipients | As of July 2011, Infrastructure Canada had received sufficient proposals for the remaining funds. $50 million was announced in respect of the PEI Transmission project in March 2015. The Department continues to work with recipients to flow funding, including final payments, and ensure that projects are closed. |
Performance Information (dollars)
Type of Transfer Payment | 2012–2013 Actual spending | 2013–2014 Actual spending | 2014–2015 Planned spending | 2014–2015 Total authorities available for use | 2014–2015 Actual spending (authorities used) | Variance (2014–2015 actual minus 2014–2015 planned) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total program |
114,912,361 |
84,567,663 |
89,429,335 |
89,429,335 |
36,862,072 |
(52,567,263) |
Total grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contributions |
114,912,361 |
84,567,663 |
89,429,335 |
89,429,335 |
36,862,072 |
(52,567,263) |
Total other types of transfer payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inuvik to Tuktoyaktuk Highway Fund:
Name of transfer payment program | Inuvik to Tuktoyaktuk Highway Program. (Payments under this program are voted). |
---|---|
Start date | 2013-2014 |
End date | 2017-2018 Footnote 25 |
Fiscal year for terms and conditions | 2013-2014 Footnote 26 |
Strategic Outcome | Public Infrastructure for a More Prosperous Canada |
Link to department's Program Alignment Architecture | Program 1.3: Investments in National Infrastructure Priorities |
Description | The objective of the Inuvik to Tuktoyaktuk Highway Program is to construct a 137 kilometer all-season road between Inuvik and Tuktoyaktuk. This includes upgrading a 19 kilometer access road to highway standards, as well as new embankment construction and related structures with final surface topping and additional work to return the land to its original state. |
Results achieved | During the last winter construction season, over 600 individuals were employed to work on this project, the majority of which were from the northern region. A total of 80 km of highway has been completed representing nearly $108 million in milestone payments to the Government of the Northwest Territories. |
Comments on variances | N/A |
Audits completed or planned | An internal audit of the Inuvik to Tuktoyaktuk Highway Control Framework was completed in January 2015. |
Evaluations completed or planned | No evaluation of this program has been completed or planned. |
Engagement of applicants and recipients | N/A |
Performance Information (dollars)
Type of Transfer Payment | 2012–2013 Actual spending | 2013–2014 Actual spending | 2014–2015 Planned spending | 2014–2015 Total authorities available for use | 2014–2015 Actual spending (authorities used) | Variance (2014–2015 actual minus 2014–2015 planned) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total program |
52,500,000 |
93,525,000 |
79,275,000 |
26,775,000 |
||
Total grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contributions |
52,500,000 |
93,525,000 |
79,275,000 |
26,775,000 |
||
Total other types of transfer payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Building Canada Fund-Provincial-Territorial Infrastructure Component-National and Regional Projects (PTIC-NRP):
Name of transfer payment program | New Building Canada Fund-Provincial-Territorial Infrastructure Component-National and Regional Projects (PTIC-NRP). (Payments under this program are voted). |
---|---|
Start date | 2014-2015 |
End date | 2023-2024 |
Fiscal year for terms and conditions | 2014-2015 Footnote 28 |
Strategic Outcome | Public Infrastructure for a More Prosperous Canada |
Link to department's Program Alignment Architecture | Program 1.4: Large-Scale Infrastructure Investments |
Description | This program provides funding to support infrastructure projects of national and regional significance that contribute to economic growth, a clean environment and stronger communities. The PTIC-NRP is an allocation-based program that recognizes and supports the important role that provinces, territories, and municipalities play in helping to build Canada's public infrastructure. |
Results achieved | The New Building Canada Fund was successfully launched on March 28, 2014. By March 31, 2015, 15 projects were announced for federal funding for the PTIC-NRP, totaling $1 billion, and leveraging over $2.4 billion from funding partners for a combined total investment of nearly $3.5 billion. These projects support the program's objectives related to economic growth, a cleaner environment and stronger communities. As of March 31, 2015, four projects are already underway. The largest categories of investments, in terms of total eligible costs are public transit infrastructure, with a total investment of over $2.9 billion, and highway and major road infrastructure, with a total investment of nearly $265 million. |
Comments on variances | This program provides significant funding for large, complex projects. It is typical for these projects to require a significant amount of upfront planning, design and procurement. These processes may occur, in whole or in part, after funding commitments are announced. As a result, there is often a period of time that will pass between project announcements and the start of construction. Even when construction has started, a number of factors beyond the control of funding recipients can result in lower spending than forecasted. These factors range from lower than anticipated project costs to project delays resulting from inclement weather and from technical and other construction- related complexities that also cause construction delays, which in turn cause claims to lag and be submitted for reduced amounts. It is also important to note that actual spending lags behind the actual rate of construction of projects since recipients are reimbursed only once claims are submitted, even though eligible costs may have already been incurred. |
Audits completed or planned | An internal audit of the New Building Canada Fund – Management Control Framework is planned for completion in October 2015. |
Evaluations completed or planned | An Evaluation of the New Building Canada Fund – PTIC-NRP is planned for completion in June 2017. |
Engagement of applicants and recipients | Provinces and Territories are responsible for identifying and bringing forward their project priorities for federal consideration. Ministerial letters were sent out to all provinces and territories to request their respective list of priorities at the same time as the launch of NBCF. INFC's website encourages eligible recipients interested in seeking funds under the PTIC-NRP to contact their provincial or territorial ministry responsible for infrastructure in order to determine the process for submitting project proposals. INFC has further facilitated the application process for the program by providing an internet-based applicant guide. The guide provides applicants with a detailed description of how to apply for funding and outlines all information that must be included to ensure that the application is complete. |
Performance Information (dollars)
Type of Transfer Payment | 2012–2013 Actual spending | 2013–2014 Actual spending | 2014–2015 Planned spending | 2014–2015 Total authorities available for use | 2014–2015 Actual spending (authorities used) | Variance (2014–2015 actual minus 2014–2015 planned) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total program |
114,480,000 Footnote 30 |
11,066,545 |
11,066,545 |
|||
Total grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contributions |
114,480,000 Footnote 30 |
11,066,545 |
11,066,545 |
|||
Total other types of transfer payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Building Canada Fund-Provincial-Territorial Infrastructure Component-Small Communities Fund (PTIC-SCF):
Name of transfer payment program | New Building Canada Fund-Provincial-Territorial Infrastructure Component-Small Communities Fund (PTIC-SCF). (Payments under this program are voted). |
---|---|
Start date | 2014-2015 |
End date | 2023-2024 |
Fiscal year for terms and conditions | 2014-2015 Footnote 31 |
Strategic Outcome | Public Infrastructure for a More Prosperous Canada |
Link to department's Program Alignment Architecture | Program 1.5: Infrastructure Investments in Smaller Communities and Rural Areas |
Description | The PTIC-SCF represents 10 percent (10%) of the overall Provincial-Territorial Infrastructure Component funding envelope, and will make $964,240,000 in contribution funding available to provinces and territories for local infrastructure. This Sub-Program will provide contribution funding for infrastructure projects in small communities with populations of 100,000 or less. Infrastructure Canada will enter into funding agreements with the provinces and territories for the implementation of the PTIC-SCF. In turn, provinces and territories will manage the project identification process in keeping with SCF program parameters. PTIC-SCF is designed to leverage the resources and existing processes of provinces and territories in managing local projects, while ensuring federal accountability and oversight for the funding envelope. |
Results achieved | All funding agreements under PTIC-SCF have been signed by the applicable provinces and territories, with the exception of Newfoundland, Saskatchewan and Quebec. During 2014-2015, there were 26 projects approved for funding in Manitoba representing $15.9 million federal share of the $1 billion was committed for this program. |
Comments on variances | Negotiations of the funding agreements with Newfoundland, Saskatchewan and Quebec are close to being finalized. |
Audits completed or planned | An internal audit of the New Building Canada Fund – Management Control Framework is planned for completion in October 2015. |
Evaluations completed or planned | An Evaluation of the New Building Canada Fund – PTIC-SCF is planned for completion in December 2018. |
Engagement of applicants and recipients | The provincial and territorial governments have been accepting project proposals through consultation and engagement with municipalities to identify priorities. To date, Infrastructure Canada has received project lists from several jurisdictions including Manitoba, Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island. |
Performance Information (dollars)
Type of Transfer Payment | 2012–2013 Actual spending | 2013–2014 Actual spending | 2014–2015 Planned spending | 2014–2015 Total authorities available for use | 2014–2015 Actual spending (authorities used) | Variance (2014–2015 actual minus 2014–2015 planned) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total program |
12,720,00033 |
Not Applicable |
||||
Total grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contributions |
12,720,000 Footnote 33 |
Not Applicable |
||||
Total other types of transfer payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Building Canada Fund-National Infrastructure Component (NBCF-NIC):
Name of transfer payment program | New Building Canada Fund-National Infrastructure Component (NBCF-NIC). (Payments under this program are voted). |
---|---|
Start date | 2014-2015 |
End date | 2023-2024 |
Fiscal year for terms and conditions | 2014-2015 Footnote 34 |
Strategic Outcome | Public Infrastructure for a More Prosperous Canada |
Link to department's Program Alignment Architecture | Program 1.3: Investments in National Infrastructure Priorities |
Description | This program supports projects of national significance, that have broad public benefits, and that contribute to Canada's long-term economic growth and prosperity. The NIC is a merit-based application-driven program, and as such there are no pre-determined provincial or territorial allocations. |
Results achieved | The New Building Canada Fund was successfully launched on March 28, 2014. By March 31, 2015, two projects has been announced for federal funding for the NIC, totaling over $68 million, and leveraging over $137 million from funding partners for a combined total investment of $205 million. These projects are of national significance, and will contribute to Canada's long-term economic growth and prosperity. The announcements represent a total investment of $131 million in port infrastructure and a total investment of $75 million in local and regional airport infrastructure. |
Comments on variances | This program provides significant funding for large, complex projects. It is typical for these projects to require a significant amount of upfront planning, design and procurement. These processes may occur, in whole or in part, after funding commitments are announced. As a result, there is often a period of time that will pass between project announcements and the start of construction. Even when construction has started, a number of factors beyond the control of funding recipients can result in lower spending than forecasted. These factors range from lower than anticipated project costs to project delays resulting from inclement weather and from technical and other construction- related complexities that also cause construction delays, which in turn cause claims to lag and be submitted for reduced amounts. It is also important to note that actual spending lags behind the actual rate of construction of projects since recipients are reimbursed only once claims are submitted, even though eligible costs may have already been incurred. |
Audits completed or planned | An internal audit of the New Building Canada Fund – Management Control Framework is planned for completion in October 2015. |
Evaluations completed or planned | An Evaluation of the New Building Canada Fund – NIC is planned for completion in March 2019. |
Engagement of applicants and recipients | INFC engaged all provinces and territories to inform them that the program was “open for business” as well as some municipalities and other potential proponents through different outreach events. INFC also facilitated the application process for the program by providing an internet-based application guide. The guide provides applicants with a detailed description of how to apply for funding and outlines all information that must be included to ensure that the application is complete. |
Performance Information (dollars)
Type of Transfer Payment | 2012–2013 Actual spending | 2013–2014 Actual spending | 2014–2015 Planned spending | 2014–2015 Total authorities available for use | 2014–2015 Actual spending (authorities used) | Variance (2014–2015 actual minus 2014–2015 planned) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total program |
15,000,000 Footnote 36 |
Not Applicable |
||||
Total grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contributions |
15,000,000 Footnote 36 |
Not Applicable |
||||
Total other types of transfer payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Recreational Trails Program:
Name of transfer payment program | National Recreational Trails Program. (Payments under this program are voted). |
---|---|
Start date | 2014-2015 |
End date | 2015-2016 |
Fiscal year for terms and conditions | 2014-2015 Footnote 37 |
Strategic Outcome | Public Infrastructure for a More Prosperous Canada |
Link to department's Program Alignment Architecture | Program 1.5: Infrastructure Investments in Smaller Communities and Rural Areas |
Description | Budget 2014 announced that the Government of Canada would enter into an agreement with the National Trails Coalition (NTC) to improve and expand snowmobile and recreational trails across the country. Funding is divided between the three major forms of trail work (snowmobile; all-terrain vehicle; and non-motorized) with notional allocations for each province and territory. Infrastructure Canada has no role in the project selection process. The NTC is an umbrella organization composed of three national-level not-for-profit organizations: the Canadian Trails Federation, the Canadian Off-Highway Vehicle Distributors Council and the Canadian Council of Snowmobile Organizations. |
Results achieved | The NTC has approved 250 projects since the program inception, resulting in the commitment of over $9.4 million in federal funding to projects representing over $33.4 million in total project cost. This represents leveraging of federal funding in the order of 350%, exceeding the 200% target outlined in the Report on Plans and Priorities. Results relating to completed projects will be reported upon in next year's Departmental Performance Report. |
Comments on variances | Not applicable; as the program was approved in March 2014, there was no 2014-2015 Planned Spending under the National Recreational Trails program in the 2014-2015 Report on Plans and Priorities. |
Audits completed or planned | An internal audit of the Funding for National Recreational Trails was completed in April 2011. |
Evaluations completed or planned | No evaluation of the program has been completed or is planned. |
Engagement of applicants and recipients | The program has been successful in leveraging federal funding to 250 projects across the country. The program is providing opportunities for employment in small and rural communities and will result in a lasting legacy of recreational trails that will benefit Canadians for many years to come. |
Performance Information (dollars)
Type of Transfer Payment | 2012–2013 Actual spending | 2013–2014 Actual spending | 2014–2015 Planned spending | 2014–2015 Total authorities available for use | 2014–2015 Actual spending (authorities used) | Variance (2014–2015 actual minus 2014–2015 planned) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total program |
5,000,000 Footnote 39 |
5,000,000 |
5,000,000 |
|||
Total grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contributions |
5,000,000 Footnote 39 |
5,000,000 |
5,000,000 |
|||
Total other types of transfer payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Horizontal Initiatives Footnote 40
- Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund (CSIF)
- Border Infrastructure Fund (BIF)
- Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund (MIRF)
- Building Canada Fund (BCF)
Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund (CSIF):
Name of horizontal initiative | Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund |
---|---|
Name of lead department(s) | Infrastructure Canada |
Federal partner organization(s) |
|
Non-federal and non-governmental partner(s) | N/A |
Start date of the horizontal initiative | 2003-2004 |
End date of the horizontal initiative | 2018-2019 Footnote 41 |
Total federal funding allocated (start to end date) (dollars) | $4.3 Billion |
Funding contributed by non-federal and non-governmental partners (dollars) | N/A |
Description of the horizontal initiative | The Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund (CSIF), which received funding in the 2001, 2003 and 2006 federal budgets, is a cost-shared contribution program for strategic infrastructure projects. To date, funding has been approved to support 82 projects.
|
Shared outcome(s) | The overall planned results Infrastructure Canada expects to achieve through CSIF are to invest in projects which:
|
Governance structures | All CSIF projects are selected under the authority of the Minister of Infrastructure, Communities and Intergovernmental Affairs and Minister of the Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec. Prior to selecting projects, the Minister consults other Ministers who have an interest in the region or in the substantive project area. After project selection, Treasury Board approval is sought for each contribution. At the same time, incremental operating funds required for project oversight and management by the implementing departments/agencies are identified and sought in the Treasury Board submission.
|
Performance highlights | In order to provide funding for quality, cost-effective public infrastructure that meets the needs of Canadians, key planning highlights under the Canadian Strategic Infrastructure Fund include:
|
Comments on variances | Targets for the fiscal year were generally met, although the number of completed projects was lower than originally projected, given that CSIF are large-scale and complex in nature and many unknowns may arise during the course of the fiscal year. |
Results achieved by non-federal and non-governmental partners | N/A |
Contact information | Bogdan Makuc, A/Director General, Program Integration, |
Performance Information
Federal organizations | Link to department's Program Alignment Architecture | Contributing programs and activities | Total allocation (from start to end date) (dollars) | 2014–15 Planned spending (dollars) | 2014–15 Actual spending (dollars) | 2014–15 Expected Results | 2014–15 Actual results against targets |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total for all federal organizations |
3,749,574,097 |
381,438,706 |
191,983,697 |
Not applicable |
|||
Transport Canada |
An efficient Transportation System |
Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund |
3,374,272,281 |
163,603,979 |
187,610,954 |
In fiscal year 2014-2015 Transport Canada will lead the implementation of nine projects on behalf of Infrastructure Canada with a combined total eligible cost of $3.1 billion. Three of these projects, with a total eligible cost of $1.3 billion, are expected to be completed in 2014-2015. |
Transport Canada continued the implementation of 13 [Note: 4 projects were not included in the RPP but are being reported in the DPR] CSIF strategic transportation projects during the fiscal year, of which 1 project valued at over $75 million in eligible costs was completed. |
Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (ACOA) |
Community Development |
Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund |
109,802,308 |
2,660,000 |
2,660,000 |
In fiscal year 2014-2015, Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (ACOA) will support the implementation of the Saint John Harbour Clean-Up Major Infrastructure Component project in New Brunswick as mandated by Infrastructure Canada, with a total eligible cost of $95.7 million. |
The ACOA facilitated closure of the Saint John Harbour Clean-Up project. The project closed by the March 2015 deadline. |
Western Economic Diversification (WED) |
Community Economic Development |
Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund |
265,499,508 |
1,742,127 |
1,712,743 |
In fiscal year 2014-2015, Western Economic Diversification (WED) will support the implementation and completion of one project as mandated by Infrastructure Canada: a water supply project in Saskatchewan, with a total eligible cost of $20.4 million. |
The project is near completion, and on track for completion in 2015-16 [Note: Although the 2014-15 RPP states that it is expected that the project will be complete in 2014-15, the 2013-14 DPR reported that the project was due to be complete in 2015-16]. |
Border Infrastructure Fund (BIF):
Name of horizontal initiative | Border Infrastructure Fund |
---|---|
Name of lead department(s) | Infrastructure Canada |
Federal partner organization(s) | Transport Canada |
Non-federal and non-governmental partner(s) | N/A |
Start date of the horizontal initiative | 2003-2004 |
End date of the horizontal initiative | 2017-2018 |
Total federal funding allocated (start to end date) (dollars) | $600 Million Footnote 42 |
Funding contributed by non-federal and non-governmental partners (dollars) | N/A |
Description of the horizontal initiative | The Border Infrastructure Fund (BIF), which was announced in Budget 2001, is a cost-shared contribution program. It complements some of the Government of Canada's other infrastructure programs such as the Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund and the Strategic Highway Infrastructure Program, a Transport Canada program.
The fund also directs some funding toward smaller and regionally important border crossings throughout Canada. Once completed, projects supported under BIF will help alleviate traffic congestion, increase system capacity and further the Smart Border Declaration (a Canada-US Declaration — North American Partnerships). |
Shared outcome(s) | The overall planned results expected to be achieved through BIF are investments in projects that contribute to safe and efficient border crossings. Expected outcomes are to alleviate border congestion and increase border crossing capacity and to increase security and safety at border crossings, leading to cross border trade efficiencies. |
Governance structures | All BIF projects are selected under the authority of the Minister of Infrastructure, Communities and Intergovernmental Affairs and Minister of the Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec. Prior to selecting projects, the Minister consults with other Ministers who have an interest in the region or in the substantive project area. After project selection, public announcements are made by the Minister of Infrastructure, Communities and Intergovernmental Affairs and Minister of the Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec. Treasury Board approval is sought for each contribution. At the same time, incremental operating funds required for project oversight and management by Transport Canada are identified and sought in the Treasury Board submission.
|
Performance highlights | In order to provide funding for quality, cost-effective public infrastructure that meets the needs of Canadians, key planning highlights under the Border Infrastructure Fund include:
|
Comments on variances | Transportation projects funded under the BIF are large and complex by nature which makes them at higher risk of experiencing unexpected delays during their implementation as was the case in previous year. Projects faced delays for various reasons including technical and other construction-related complexities. Those factors lead to delays in the disbursement of federal contributions and the completion of projects. |
Results achieved by non-federal and non-governmental partners | N/A |
Contact information | Bogdan Makuc, A/Director General, Program Integration, |
Performance Information
Federal organizations | Link to department's Program Alignment Architecture | Contributing programs and activities | Total allocation (from start to end date) (dollars) | 2014–15 Planned spending (dollars) | 2014–15 Actual spending (dollars) | 2014–15 Expected Results | 2014–15 Actual results against targets |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total for all federal organizations |
604,087,470 |
23,402,310 |
20,863,226 |
Not applicable |
|||
Transport Canada |
An Efficient Transportation System |
Border Infrastructure Fund |
604,087,470 |
23,402,310 |
20,863,226 |
In fiscal year 2014-2015, Transport Canada will support the implementation of two projects under the Border Infrastructure Fund on behalf of INFC, with a total eligible cost of $515.2 million. These projects are all expected to be completed after fiscal year 2014-2015. |
Transport Canada continues to support the implementation of three Border Infrastructure Fund projects with total eligible costs of $567 million [Note: 1 BIF project was not included in RPP but is now being reported in the DPR] |
Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund (MIRF):
Name of horizontal initiative | Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund |
---|---|
Name of lead department(s) | Infrastructure Canada |
Federal partner organization(s) |
|
Non-federal and non-governmental partner(s) | N/A |
Start date of the horizontal initiative | 2004-2005 |
End date of the horizontal initiative | 2014-2015 |
Total federal funding allocated (start to end date) (dollars) | $1.2 Billion Footnote 43 |
Funding contributed by non-federal and non-governmental partners (dollars) | N/A |
Description of the horizontal initiative | The $1.2 billion MIRF has been structured to provide a balanced response to local infrastructure needs in urban and rural Canada and will ensure that all Canadians, whether they live in large, small or remote communities, will share in the benefits of infrastructure investments. |
Shared outcome(s) | The overall expected outcomes are:
|
Governance structures | The MIRF is based on a federal partnership arrangement between Infrastructure Canada and five federal partners: Western Economic Diversification, Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec, the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency, Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario, and the Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency. It involves 14 sub-programs, one joint sub-program for each province and territory, and a sub-program for First Nations communities. Each of the 14 sub-programs follows the same general conditions, priorities and approaches. Also, recognizing the individual nature of each sub-program, the various agreements reflect the nature of the partnership as it relates to the order of government. |
Performance highlights | The Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund program formally concluded on March 31, 2014 in most provinces and territories. Over the past year, Infrastructure Canada, in close collaboration with federal delivery partners, has been focusing its effort on program closeout activities. These activities include:
|
Comments on variances | Program spending in 2013-2014 was lower than planned. This can be attributed to a number of factors beyond the control of funding recipients. Those factors such as inclement weather, geological challenges and technical delays and other construction-related complexities can lead to construction delays which in turn cause claims to lag and be submitted for reduced amounts. |
Results achieved by non-federal and non-governmental partners | N/A |
Contact information | Bogdan Makuc, A/Director General, Program Integration, |
Performance Information
Federal organizations | Link to department's Program Alignment Architecture | Contributing programs and activities | Total allocation (from start to end date) (dollars) | 2014–15 Planned spending (dollars) | 2014–15 Actual spending (dollars) | 2014–15 Expected Results | 2014–15 Actual results against targets |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total for all federal organizations |
1,021, 805,000 |
7,276,897 |
Not applicable |
||||
Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec (CED-Q) |
An efficient Transportation System |
Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund |
241,844,000 |
7,276,897 |
See Footnote 44 |
Infrastructure Canada and the Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec continued to work collaboratively towards the closure of projects during 2014-2015. By March 31, 2015, a total of 228 projects were completed of the 232 projects funded in the Province of Quebec. |
Building Canada Fund (BCF):
Name of horizontal initiative | Building Canada Fund |
---|---|
Name of lead department(s) | Infrastructure Canada |
Federal partner organization(s) |
|
Non-federal and non-governmental partner(s) | N/A |
Start date of the horizontal initiative | 2008-2009 |
End date of the horizontal initiative | 2016-2017 |
Total federal funding allocated (start to end date) (dollars) | $8.8 Billion Footnote 45 |
Funding contributed by non-federal and non-governmental partners (dollars) | N/A |
Description of the horizontal initiative | The Building Canada Fund focuses on projects that deliver economic, environmental, and social benefits to Canadians. |
Shared outcome(s) | The expected outcomes are to deliver infrastructure that matters to Canadians, including cleaner air and water, safer roads and shorter commutes while supporting broad federal priorities of a stronger economy, cleaner environment and liveable communities. |
Governance structures |
All BCF-MIC projects are selected under the authority of the Minister of Infrastructure, Communities and Intergovernmental Affairs, and priorities are identified through discussions with provinces. Prior to selecting projects, the Minister consults other Ministers who have an interest in the region or in the substantive project area. Following due diligence, the Minister can approve projects under all project categories under the BCF delegated threshold ($100 million federal share). Treasury Board approval is required for contributions to any projects above the delegated threshold (i.e. $100 million federal contribution) or that require exemptions to program terms and conditions. At the same time, should they be required for transportation projects, incremental operating funds required for project oversight and management by Transport Canada are identified and sought in the Treasury Board submission.
BCF-CC is governed by separate federal-provincial contribution agreements, each of which is managed by an Oversight Committee established by the Infrastructure Framework Committee that includes both federal and provincial senior officials. To support the operation of the Communities Component and Oversight Committees, each jurisdiction has a federal-provincial Joint Secretariat staffed by Federal Delivery Partners and provincial officials. |
Performance highlights | Under BCF-MIC:
Projects funded under the Building Canada Fund-Major Infrastructure Component will contribute to a competitive economy, cleaner environment and liveable communities by targeting larger infrastructure projects of national or regional significance. |
Comments on variances | The BCF–MIC program provides significant funding for large, complex projects. It is typical for these projects to require a significant amount of upfront planning, design and procurement. These processes may occur, in whole or in part, after funding commitments are announced. As a result, there is often a period of time that will pass between project announcements and the start of construction. Even when construction has started, a number of factors beyond the control of funding recipients can result in lower spending than forecasted. These factors range from lower than anticipated project costs to project delays resulting from inclement weather and from technical and other construction- related complexities that also cause construction delays which, in turn, cause claims to lag and be submitted for reduced amounts and cause delays in the completion of projects. It is also important to note that actual spending lags behind the actual rate of construction of projects since recipients are reimbursed only once claims are submitted, even though eligible costs may have already been incurred. |
Results achieved by non-federal and non-governmental partners | N/A |
Contact information | Bogdan Makuc, A/Director General, Program Integration, |
Performance Information
Federal organizations | Link to department's Program Alignment Architecture | Contributing programs and activities | Total allocation (from start to end date) (dollars) | 2014–15 Planned spending (dollars) | 2014–15 Actual spending (dollars) | 2014–15 Expected Results | 2014–15 Actual results against targets |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total for all federal organizations |
6,085,561,875 |
597,199,447 |
449,636,349 |
Not applicable |
|||
Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (ACOA) |
Community Development |
Building Canada Fund-Communities Component |
155,434,547 |
11,001,360 |
9,466,579 |
In fiscal year 2014-2015, ACOA, as mandated by Infrastructure Canada, will manage the delivery of funding to projects currently underway in Nova Scotia, New Brunswick as well as Newfoundland and Labrador. Ten of these projects are expected to be completed in fiscal year 2014-2015, with a combined eligible cost of $15.9 million. |
Since inception of the program, a total of 176 projects have been completed. Of these, 7 projects were completed in 2014-2015. A total of 45 projects remain to be completed. Some projects have experienced delays due to the nature of the construction industry. |
Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec (CED-Q) |
Strengthening of Community Economies |
Building Canada Fund-Communities Component |
422,615,358 |
72,488,000 |
29,284,622 |
In fiscal year 2014-2015, CED-Q, as mandated by Infrastructure Canada, will continue to manage the delivery of funding to projects currently underway in the regions of Québec. Three of these projects are expected to be completed during the fiscal year 2014-2015, with a combined total eligible cost of $31.9 million. |
As of March 31, 2015, 72 projects under the fund have been completed which includes 3 projects completed in 2014-2015. Infrastructure Canada continues to work closely with CED–Q to monitor the progress of 60 ongoing projects. |
Transport Canada |
An Efficient Transportation System |
Building Canada Fund-Major Infrastructure Component |
4,755,519,683 |
456,839,923 |
373,297,646 |
Transport Canada will continue to serve as the lead federal department in the management of contribution agreements for transportation projects under BCF-MIC. In its role, Transport Canada will continue to work with recipients to implement Contribution Agreements and to deliver program funding to recipients under the Terms and Conditions of the BCF-MIC. Transport Canada and Infrastructure Canada will continue to work together to review new transportation project priorities that are identified for funds remaining under the BCF-MIC, but Infrastructure Canada will be solely responsible for reviewing transit projects. In addition, Infrastructure Canada and Transport Canada will ensure that all selected projects meet the eligibility criteria of the BCF-MIC as set out in the program Terms and Conditions. Based on information available from project proponents, it is expected that 21 projects will be completed during fiscal year 2014-2015. |
Transport Canada continued the implementation of 43 active transportation projects under BCF-MIC. During 2014-2015, 9 projects valued at over $410 million in eligible costs were completed. |
Western Economic Diversification (WED) |
Community Economic Development |
Building Canada Fund-Communities Component |
372,793,428 |
$36,050,039 |
23,869,601 |
In fiscal year 2014-2015, WED, as mandated by Infrastructure Canada, will manage the delivery of projects currently underway in British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba. Seventeen of these projects are expected to be completed in fiscal year 2014-2015, with a combined total eligible cost of $111.7 million. |
As of March 31, 2015, 235 projects under the fund have been completed which includes 26 projects completed in 2014-2015. Infrastructure Canada continues to work closely with WED to monitor the progress of 74 ongoing projects. |
Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario (FedDev Ontario) |
Community Economic Development |
Building Canada Fund-Communities Component |
379,198,859 |
20,820,125 |
13,717,901 |
In fiscal year 2014-1015, FedDev, as mandated by Infrastructure Canada, will manage the delivery of funding to projects currently underway in regions of Ontario. Five of these projects are expected to be completed in fiscal year 2014-2015, with a combined eligible cost of $41.2 million. |
As of March 31, 2015, 244 projects under the fund have been completed which includes 2 projects completed in 2014-2015. Infrastructure Canada continues to work closely with FedDev to monitor the progress of 45 ongoing projects. |
Departmental Sustainable Development Strategy
4. Theme IV: Targets and Implementation Strategies | |
---|---|
Target 7.2: Green Procurement | |
As of April 1, 2014, the Government of Canada will continue to take action to embed environmental considerations into public procurement, in accordance with the federal Policy on Green Procurement. |
|
Scope and Context | |
Infrastructure Canada is committed to addressing the Policy on Green Procurement. As such, in meeting the policy requirements, it will continue to incorporate environmental considerations in its decision-making processes for all procurement. |
|
Link to Department's Program Alignment Architecture | |
All Programs and Internal Services. |
|
Financial Performance Expectations | |
Not Applicable. |
|
Performance Measurement | |
Expected result | |
Environmentally responsible acquisition, use and disposal of goods and services. |
|
Performance indicator | Performance level achieved |
Departmental approach to further the implementation of the Policy on Green Procurement in place as of April 1, 2014. In 2014-2015, in the context of the Policy on Green Procurement, Infrastructure Canada accomplished the following: |
|
|
100% |
|
100% |
|
100% |
|
100% |
|
100% |
Number and percentage of procurement and/or materiel management specialists who completed the Canada School of Public Service Green Procurement course (C215) or equivalent, in fiscal year 2014-2015. |
Four employees (80%) |
Number and percentage of managers and functional heads of procurement and materiel whose performance evaluation includes support and contribution toward green procurement, in fiscal year 2014-2015. |
Three positions (100%) |
Departmental green procurement target | |
Procurement of Computers and Related Equipment, Printers and Photocopiers |
|
Performance indicator | Performance level achieved |
Percentage of procurement decisions with regards to computers and related equipment, printers and photocopiers that continued to take into account green procurement principles, considerations and objectives of the Policy on Green Procurement. |
100% |
Departmental green procurement target | |
Procurement of Furniture, Office Supplies and Goods |
|
Performance indicator | Performance level achieved |
Percentage of procurement decisions with regards to furniture, office supplies and goods that take into account green procurement principles, considerations and objectives of the Policy on Green Procurement. |
100% |
Departmental green procurement target | |
Green Procurement Information on Contracting Services |
|
Performance indicator | Performance level achieved |
Percentage of contracting services transactions that include green procurement information, i.e. that meet green procurement principles, considerations and objectives of the Policy on Green Procurement. Number of contracting services transactions that incorporate green procurement information, relative to the total number of contracting services transactions made by the Department. |
75% |
Implementation strategy element or best practice | Performance level achieved |
7.2.1.5. Leverage common use procurement instruments where available and feasible. |
100% |
7.2.2. Incorporate environmental considerations into procurement instruments. |
INFC uses the Public Works and Government Services Canada Instruments for procurement 100% |
Best Practice |
Achieved |
Best Practice |
100% |
Since 2008-2009, the Department has continued to work with Public Works and Government Services Canada to analyze its spending patterns and to identify opportunities for improvement in its procurement practices. |
Infrastructure Canada has continued to include standard, generic environmental clauses in the terms and conditions of its service contracts. Final reports are printed double-sided, and on recycled paper, in keeping with the principles of the greening government operations initiative. Since 2009-2010, Infrastructure Canada's Contracting and Procurement Unit has continued to update the departmental contracting systems to identify, track and capture green procurement information. In its procurement decision-making processes, Infrastructure Canada implements innovative and up-to-date procurement processes and controls as it strives to find opportunities for improvement in its procurement practices. For example, when initiating procurement, the Department first considers standing offers from Public Works and Government Services Canada, including those with green procurement clauses. If no standing offers are available for the required goods or services, the Department proceeds with other available procurement mechanisms. The Department has continued to use standing offers that have green procurement considerations, and will continue to look for additional ways to include environmental considerations into procurement processes and controls. Instruments are being used by INFC 100% |
Additional activities | Performance level achieved |
Infrastructure Canada has continued to use multi-functional printers in common areas to reduce the overall number of printers, fax and scanner devices needed. Since 2012-2013, usage-based audits were used to guide a reduction in the number of multi-function printers, shifting printers to address departmental needs and increasing the number of employees sharing each device. Energy Star certified computers, monitors and standalone printers were purchased when available, and empty toner cartridges were returned to vendors for recycling. |
100% |
Infrastructure Canada has continued to purchase and lease energy-efficient equipment from companies that supported environmental programs that had recycled content and recycling programs. The equipment uses multi-function photocopiers and printer machines to reduce energy consumption and recycled toner cartridges. The Department implements a policy on standard shared printers versus personal printers, and ensures that default settings on printers and photocopiers are set to print double-sided, and on black and white. |
75% |
Infrastructure Canada has continued to ensure that defective and end-of-life telecommunications devices and accessories are sent to vendors for recycling where they are re-used as telecommunications devices. In addition, employees are encouraged to use USB memory sticks which provide more storage capacity. |
Achieved |
For commuting to and from work, Infrastructure Canada has continued to encourage employees to use green modes of transportation such as buses, cycling and walking to work, if possible. |
Achieved |
6. Sustainable Development Management System | |
Although Infrastructure Canada is not required to table a Departmental Sustainable Development Strategy or to report on its contribution to the Federal Sustainable Development Strategy, it continues to play an important role in helping create a more sustainable future. The Department's broad range of infrastructure programs support thousands of projects across Canada that contribute to a cleaner environment in areas such as drinking water, wastewater, clean energy, public transit and brownfield redevelopment. Many of these infrastructure investments directly support the Federal Sustainable Development Strategy's Theme I - Addressing Climate Change and Air Quality and Theme II - Maintaining Water Quality and Availability. |
|
7. Strategic Environmental Assessment | |
During the 2014–2015 reporting cycle, Infrastructure Canada did not develop any policy, plan or program proposals that required a preliminary scan for identifying any potential important environmental effects. As such, Infrastructure Canada did not develop any initiatives that required a strategic environmental assessment. |
Status Report on Transformational and Major Crown Projects Footnote 46
New Bridge for the St. Lawrence Corridor Project:
Project name | New Bridge for the St. Lawrence Corridor Project |
||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description | The existing Champlain Bridge is one of the busiest bridges in Canada with traffic estimated at over 40 million vehicles per year. It is a major Canada-United States trade corridor, handling $20 billion of international trade and 11 million transit commuters per year. |
||||||||||||||||
Project outcomes |
|
||||||||||||||||
Industrial benefits | Replacing the existing infrastructures, as well as widening the A15 Highway will mitigate any risk of disrupting the trade corridor and will improve the flow of traffic. |
||||||||||||||||
Sponsoring department | Infrastructure of Canada |
||||||||||||||||
Contracting authority | Public Works and Government Services Canada |
||||||||||||||||
Participating departments | Public Works and Government Services Canada, Justice Canada, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Environment Canada |
||||||||||||||||
Prime contractor | Project Financial and Business Advisor Project Technical Advisor |
||||||||||||||||
Major subcontractors | Traffic and Revenue Forecast |
||||||||||||||||
Project phase | During the 2014-15 fiscal year, the NBSLC project team advanced the procurement process so as to ensure that a private partner would be selected in Spring 2015 in order to undertake the design, construction, financing, operation, maintenance and rehabilitation of the NBSLC projects various components. |
||||||||||||||||
Major milestones |
|
||||||||||||||||
Progress report and explanation of variances |
|
Response to Parliamentary Committees and External Audits
Response to parliamentary committees
Nothing to report for the period of 2014-2015. There were no recommendations to Infrastructure Canada from Parliamentary Committees in 2014-2015.
Response to the Auditor General (including to the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development)
Nothing to report for the period of 2014-2015. There were no recommendations to Infrastructure Canada from the Auditor General or the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development in 2014-2015.
Response to external audits conducted by the Public Service Commission of Canada or the Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages
Nothing to report for the period of 2014-2015. There were no external audits conducted by the Public Service Commission of Canada or the Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages for Infrastructure Canada in 2014-2015.
Internal Audits and Evaluation
Title of Internal Audit | Internal Audit Type | Completion Date |
---|---|---|
Audit of Information Technology Business Transformation - SIMSI Migration Project |
Internal Services - Information Technology (IT) |
June 2014 |
Governance and Risk Management |
October 2014 |
|
Audit of Inuvik to Tuktoyaktuk Highway |
Governance and Internal Controls |
January 2015 |
Link to Department's Program Alignment Architecture | Title of the Evaluation | Deputy Head Approval Date |
---|---|---|
Investments in National Infrastructure Priorities and Large-Scale Infrastructure Investments |
Final Report - Joint Evaluation of Infrastructure Canada's Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund and Border Infrastructure Fund |
June 2014 |
Footnotes
- Footnote 1
-
Allocations for Transfer Payment Programs include Contributions only, and do not include Operating and Maintenance (O&M).
- Footnote 2
-
The funding profile under the Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund was extended until 2018-2019 for certain projects.
- Footnote 3
-
Fiscal year in which the terms and conditions were last approved, continued or amended by Treasury Board or the Minister.
- Footnote 4
-
Of the $4.3 billion originally allocated to the CSIF, $50 million was transferred to the Parks Canada Agency to support a high priority infrastructure project. These funds were reallocated through Estimates processes prior to 2015-2016. In addition, $12.8 million was also removed from the CSIF funding envelope through various government-wide reduction and reallocation exercises prior to the 2010 Strategic Review.
- Footnote 5
-
The funding profile under the Border Infrastructure Fund was extended until 2017-2018 for certain projects.
- Footnote 6
-
Fiscal year in which the terms and conditions were last approved, continued or amended by Treasury Board or the Minister.
- Footnote 7
-
Of the $600 million originally allocated to the BIF, approximately $18 million was transferred to the Canada Border Services Agency for border projects, and these funds were reallocated through Estimates processes prior to 2015-2016. Under the 2010 Strategic Review process, $10.4 million in unallocated funds from the Border Infrastructure Fund was identified for reallocation to other government priorities. These funds were reallocated through Estimates processes prior to 2015-2016. No infrastructure projects have been cancelled or otherwise affected as result of these reallocations.
- Footnote 8
-
The funding profile under the Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund was extended until 2014-2015 for certain projects.
- Footnote 9
-
Fiscal year in which the terms and conditions were last approved/continued/amended by Treasury Board or the Minister.
- Footnote 10
-
Under the 2010 Strategic Review process, $23 million in unallocated funds from MIRF was reallocated to other government priorities. These funds were removed from departmental reference levels through Estimates processes prior to 2013-14. No infrastructure projects have been cancelled or otherwise affected as result of this reallocation.
- Footnote 11
-
There is no 2014-2015 Planned Spending for this program, as when the 2014-2015 Report on Plans and Priorities was created it was anticipated that the program would be finalized, but funding was re-profiled to 2014-2015.
- Footnote 12
-
Legislation enacting permanent funding for the Gas Tax Fund received Royal Assent on December 15, 2011.
- Footnote 13
-
Fiscal year in which the terms and conditions were last approved, continued or amended by Treasury Board or the Minister.
- Footnote 14
-
The funding profile under the Provincial-Territorial Infrastructure Base Fund was extended until 2016-2017 for certain jurisdictions.
- Footnote 15
-
Fiscal year in which the terms and conditions were last approved, continued or amended by Treasury Board or the Minister.
- Footnote 16
-
The funding profile under the Building Canada Fund-Communities Component was extended until 2016-2017 for certain projects.
- Footnote 17
-
Fiscal year in which the terms and conditions were last approved, continued or amended by Treasury Board or the Minister.
- Footnote 18
-
As a result of the 2010 Strategic Review, Infrastructure Canada is saving $5.4 million on administration by improving the delivery of the BCF-CC. These funds were made available for other Government of Canada priorities, and funding for infrastructure projects remained unchanged.
- Footnote 19
-
The funding profile under the Building Canada Fund-Major Infrastructure Component was extended until 2018-2019 for certain projects.
- Footnote 20
-
Fiscal year in which the terms and conditions were last approved, continued or amended by Treasury Board or the Minister.
- Footnote 21
-
As a result of the 2010 Strategic Review, Infrastructure Canada is saving $4.9 million on administration by improving the delivery of the BCF-MIC. These funds were made available for other Government of Canada priorities, and funding for infrastructure projects remained unchanged.
- Footnote 22
-
The funding profile under the Green Infrastructure Fund was extended until 2020-2021 for certain projects.
- Footnote 23
-
Fiscal year in which the terms and conditions were last approved, continued or amended by Treasury Board or the Minister.
- Footnote 24
-
Of the $1 billion originally allocated to the GIF, $169.98 million was transferred to other federal departments to support high-priority initiatives. These departments were Natural Resources Canada ($100 million for the Forestry Industry Transformation Program), Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec ($30 million for the Temporary Initiative for the Strengthening of Quebec's Forest Economies and $18.15 million for the Natural Gas Pipeline between Vallée Jonction and Thetford Mines), and Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada ($21.83 million for the Beaufort Regional Environmental Assessment). These funds were reallocated through Estimates processes prior to 2015-2016.
In addition, as part of the 2010 Strategic Review process, $45 million in unallocated funds from the GIF was removed from departmental reference levels, and made available for other Government of Canada priorities. This was approved in Budget 2011. As well, in the 2012-2013 Main Estimates, $58.7 million was approved and reallocated from the GIF as a source of funds for the operating requirements of the Department. No announced infrastructure projects have been cancelled or otherwise affected as a result of these reallocations. - Footnote 25
-
The funding profile under the Inuvik to Tuktoyaktuk Highway Program is provided until 2017-2018.
- Footnote 26
-
Fiscal year in which the terms and conditions were last approved, continued or amended by Treasury Board or the Minister.
- Footnote 27
-
There was no 2012-2013 and 2013-2014 Actual Spending for the Inuvik to Tuktoyaktuk Highway Program, as the program was approved in November 2013. 2013-2014 Actual Spending under this program was to be reported under the Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund, but there were no expenses to record, as the program started in late 2013-2014.
Return to first footnote 27 referrer
Return to second footnote 27 referrer
- Footnote 28
-
Fiscal year in which the terms and conditions were last approved, continued or amended by Treasury Board or the Minister.
- Footnote 29
-
There was no 2012-2013 and 2013-2014 Actual Spending under the New Building Canada Fund-Provincial-Territorial Infrastructure Component-National and Regional Projects, as the program was approved in March 2014.
Return to first footnote 29 referrer
Return to second footnote 29 referrer
- Footnote 30
-
There was no 2014-2015 Planned Spending under the New Building Canada Fund-Provincial-Territorial Infrastructure Component-National and Regional Projects in the 2014-2015 Report on Plans and Priorities, as the program was approved in March 2014. Funding for this program in 2014-2015 was obtained through 2014-2015 Supplementary Estimates processes.
Return to first footnote 30 referrer
Return to second footnote 30 referrer
- Footnote 31
-
Fiscal year in which the terms and conditions were last approved, continued or amended by Treasury Board or the Minister.
- Footnote 32
-
There was no 2012-2013 and 2013-2014 Actual Spending under the New Building Canada Fund-Provincial-Territorial Infrastructure Component-Small Communities Fund, as the program was approved in March 2014. As well, there was no 2014-2015 Actual Spending under this program.
Return to first footnote 32 referrer
Return to second footnote 32 referrer
Return to third footnote 32 referrer
Return to fourth footnote 32 referrer
Return to fifth footnote 32 referrer
- Footnote 33
-
There was no 2014-2015 Planned Spending under the New Building Canada Fund-Provincial-Territorial Infrastructure Component-Small Communities Fund in the 2014-2015 Report on Plans and Priorities, as the program was approved in March 2014. Funding for this program in 2014-2015 was obtained through 2014-2015 Supplementary Estimates processes.
- Footnote 34
-
Fiscal year in which the terms and conditions were last approved, continued or amended by Treasury Board or the Minister.
- Footnote 35
-
There was no 2012-2013 and 2013-2014 Actual Spending under the New Building Canada Fund-National Infrastructure Component, as the program was approved in March 2014. As well, there was no 2014-2015 Actual Spending under this program.
Return to first footnote 35 referrer
Return to second footnote 35 referrer
Return to third footnote 35 referrer
Return to fourth footnote 35 referrer
- Footnote 36
-
There was no 2014-2015 Planned Spending under the New Building Canada Fund-National Infrastructure Component in the 2014-2015 Report on Plans and Priorities, as the program was approved in March 2014. Funding for this program in 2014-2015 was obtained through 2014-2015 Supplementary Estimates processes.
Return to first footnote 36 referrer
Return to second footnote 36 referrer
- Footnote 37
-
Fiscal year in which the terms and conditions were last approved, continued or amended by Treasury Board or the Minister.
- Footnote 38
-
There was no 2012-2013 and 2013-2014 Actual Spending under the National Recreational Trails Program, as the program was approved in March 2014.
Return to first footnote 38 referrer
Return to second footnote 38 referrer
- Footnote 39
-
There was no 2014-2015 Planned Spending under the National Recreational Trails Program in the 2014-2015 Report on Plans and Priorities, as the program was approved in March 2014. Funding for this program in 2014-2015 was obtained through 2014-2015 Supplementary Estimates processes
Return to first footnote 39 referrer
Return to second footnote 39 referrer
- Footnote 40
-
Allocations for Horizontal Initiatives Programs include Contributions and Operating and Maintenance (O&M). As of 2016-17, the Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund (CSIF), the Border Infrastructure Fund (BIF), the Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund (MIRF), and the Building Canada Fund (BCF) will no longer be reported on under the Horizontal Initiatives supplementary table as that they no longer fall under the Treasury Board definition of a horizontal initiative.
- Footnote 41
-
Of the $4.3 billion originally allocated to the CSIF, $50 million was transferred to the Parks Canada Agency to support a high priority infrastructure project. These funds were reallocated through Estimates processes prior to 2014-2015. In addition, $12.8 million was also removed from the CSIF funding envelope through various government-wide reduction and reallocation exercises prior to the 2010 Strategic Review.
- Footnote 42
-
Of the $600 million originally allocated to the BIF, approximately $18 million was transferred to the Canada Border Services Agency for border projects. These funds were reallocated through Estimates processes prior to 2014-2015. Under the 2010 Strategic Review process, $10.4 million in unallocated funds from the Border Infrastructure Fund was identified for reallocation to other government priorities. These funds were reallocated through Estimates processes prior to 2014-1205. No infrastructure projects have been cancelled or otherwise affected as result of these reallocations.
- Footnote 43
-
As a result of the 2010 Strategic Review process, $23 million in unallocated funds from the MIRF was identified for reallocation to other Government of Canada priorities. No announced infrastructure projects were cancelled, or otherwise affected as result of this reallocation.
- Footnote 44
-
There is no 2014-2015 Planned Spending or 2014-2015 Expected Results for this program, as when the 2014-2015 Report on Plans and Priorities was created it was anticipated that the program would be finalized, but funding was re-profiled to 2014-2015.
- Footnote 45
-
As a result of the 2010 Strategic Review, Infrastructure Canada is saving $5.4 million and $4.9 million on administration by improving the delivery of the Building Canada Fund-Communities Component and the Building Canada Fund-Major Infrastructure Component respectively. These funds are available for other Government of Canada priorities. The funding for infrastructure projects remains unchanged. Column 14 of the table reflects the actual project funding delivered by federal delivery partners, under the BCF terms and conditions, as well as their associated administrative costs.
- Footnote 46
-
INFC added this new program to its Program Alignment Architecture following the release of the 2014-2015 RPP to reflect the transfer of responsibility for the NBSLC project from Transport Canada to INFC.
- Date modified: