Minister of Rural Economic Development Transition Book (October 2019)
Long text descriptions of graphs
Figure 1: Overview placement
Placemat: Overview of Rural Economic Development. The Minister for Rural Economic Development is supported by the Centre for Rural Economic Development, based at Infrastructure Canada. The Minister leads a whole of government approach to: ensure a “rural lens” in federal policymaking, engage provinces and territories to leverage support at all levels, ensure rural communities can access federal support, support evidence-based decision making at all levels, and set benchmarks for success in rural Canada. Rural challenges and priorities include high-speed connectivity, skills development, resilient infrastructure, attracting newcomers, inter-community transportation, and affordable housing. Key federal partners identified include the Regional Development Agencies, Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada, Infrastructure Canada, Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, Employment and Social Development Canada, Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada, Transport Canada, and Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation. Other delivery partners include municipal associations, and academic, Indigenous, and non-profit organizations.
Figure 2: What we Heard diagram
This infographic provides an overview of what was heard during cross-Canada consultations to foster economic development in rural Canada. Suggestions for the federal government’s role were for policies and programs to take into account rural realities, working together with provinces, territories, municipalities and Indigenous governments, breaking down silos between departments and agencies, and a whole community approach for rural economic development. The top identified issue was broadband and connectivity – critical for business, education, access to services, and safety. Other key areas were housing, infrastructure, access to services, supporting businesses and entrepreneurship, attracting and retaining talent, transportation, energy and food security.
Figure 3: Urbanization in Canada (1851-2016)
Year |
Percent of Population in Rural Areas |
Percent of Population in Urban Areas |
---|---|---|
1851 |
87 |
13 |
1861 |
84 |
16 |
1871 |
81 |
19 |
1881 |
75 |
25 |
1891 |
69 |
31 |
1901 |
63 |
37 |
1911 |
55 |
45 |
1921 |
51 |
49 |
1931 |
46 |
54 |
1941 |
46 |
54 |
1951 |
38 |
62 |
1961 |
30 |
70 |
1971 |
24 |
76 |
1981 |
24 |
76 |
1991 |
23 |
77 |
2001 |
20 |
80 |
2011 |
19 |
81 |
2016 |
18.7 |
81.3 |
Source: Statistics Canada. Census of Population 2016
Figure 4: Population Pyramid: Rural and Urban Canada (2016)
Age Groups |
Urban Population |
Rural Population |
---|---|---|
0 to 4 years |
1,321,895 |
578,130 |
10 to 14 years |
1,339,235 |
584,970 |
100 years and over |
5,630 |
2,600 |
15 to 19 years |
1,427,995 |
599,695 |
20 to 24 years |
1,663,020 |
581,005 |
25 to 29 years |
1,703,760 |
583,630 |
30 to 34 years |
1,718,705 |
612,225 |
35 to 39 years |
1,675,625 |
614,350 |
40 to 44 years |
1,644,110 |
612,885 |
45 to 49 years |
1,703,275 |
658,795 |
5 to 9 years |
1,402,120 |
617,475 |
50 to 54 years |
1,857,060 |
823,180 |
55 to 59 years |
1,744,845 |
877,620 |
60 to 64 years |
1,477,210 |
815,245 |
65 to 69 years |
1,257,500 |
716,780 |
70 to 74 years |
902,660 |
519,545 |
75 to 79 years |
660,160 |
362,680 |
80 to 84 years |
493,155 |
257,190 |
85 to 89 years |
321,600 |
161,300 |
90 to 94 years |
150,030 |
73,645 |
95 to 99 years |
37,860 |
18,700 |
Source: Statistics Canada. Census of Population 2016
Figure 5: Share of National Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in non-Census Metropolitan Areas
Year | Percentage of Gross Domestic Product in non-Census Metropolitan Areas |
---|---|
2001 |
28.4 |
2002 |
27.7 |
2003 |
28.5 |
2004 |
28.8 |
2005 |
30.2 |
2006 |
29.7 |
2007 |
30.1 |
2008 |
30.5 |
2009 |
27.8 |
2010 |
28 |
2011 |
28.9 |
2012 |
28.4 |
2013 |
28.6 |
Sources: Statistics Canada. Table 36-10-0423-01 (for years 2001 to 2009), Statistics Canada. Table 36-10-0468-01 (for years 2010 to 2013)
Figure 6: Gross Domestic Product growth by select industry (chained 2012 dollars) (2013 to 2017)
Sector |
Percentage Growth |
---|---|
Finance and insurance |
15.7 |
Real estate and rental and leasing |
11.8 |
Mining, quarrying and oil and gas extraction |
10.5 |
Manufacturing |
8.2 |
Professional, scientific and technical services |
7.8 |
Construction |
0.0 |
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting |
-0.2 |
Source: Statistics Canada. Table 36-10-0434-03 GDP at basic prices, by industry, annual average (for years 2013 to 2017)
Figure 7: Unemployment rate by province and rural/urban, 2018
Province/Territory |
Percentage unemployed in rural areas |
Percentage unemployed in urban areas |
---|---|---|
Newfoundland and Labrador |
23 |
9 |
Prince Edward Island |
13 |
7* |
Nova Scotia |
7* |
7 |
New Brunswick |
11 |
6 |
Quebec |
6* |
5 |
Ontario |
5* |
4 |
Manitoba |
5* |
6 |
Saskatchewan |
4* |
6 |
Alberta |
5* |
6 |
British Columbia |
5* |
4 |
Yukon |
N/A |
N/A |
Northwest Territories |
N/A |
N/A |
Nunavut |
N/A |
N/A |
Source: Statistics Canada. Table 14-10-0106-01
Notes: All figures have been rounded to the nearest whole number
*Contains data in at least one sub-category suppressed to meet the confidentiality requirements of the Statistics Act. e.g.: PEI's urban unemployed figure for individuals aged 65 year and above was indicated as 'x' due to this reason.
Figure 8: Share of total employment by sector, 2018
Sector | Percentage in urban areas |
Percentage in rural areas |
---|---|---|
Goods producing sector |
19.1 |
32.9 |
Services producing sector |
80.9 |
67.1 |
Source: Statistics Canada. Table 14-10-0106-01
Figure 9: Highest Level of Educational Attainment in Canada, 2016
Level of education |
Percentage attained in rural areas |
Percentage attained in urban areas |
---|---|---|
No certificate |
26 |
16 |
Secondary |
26 |
26.5 |
Trades |
14 |
9 |
College |
19 |
18 |
Some university |
2.5 |
2.6 |
Bachelor and above |
11 |
25 |
Sources: Canada Council on Learning (2006), The Rural Urban Gap in Education; Moazzami, B., (2012), Survey of Multinational and Multi-Locational Firms in Northern Ontario; Statistics Canada, Census of Population (2016).
Figure 10: Life satisfaction score (out of 10)
Area of residence |
Life satisfaction score (out of 10) |
---|---|
Rural Newfoundland |
8.3 |
Rural Quebec |
8.2 |
Rural Ontario |
8.2 |
Rural Alberta |
8.1 |
Rural British Columbia |
8.1 |
Halifax |
8.1 |
Edmonton |
8.1 |
Calgary |
8.1 |
Montreal |
8.1 |
Toronto |
8.0 |
Vancouver |
7.9 |
Source: Statistics Canada, Canadian Community Health Survey 2016
Figure 11: Home ownership rates, 2016
City |
Percentage home ownership rates |
---|---|
Oshawa |
78 |
Rural (nationally) |
78 |
Calgary |
73 |
Edmonton |
70 |
Toronto |
67 |
Vancouver |
64 |
Halifax |
60 |
Montreal |
56 |
Source: Statistics Canada, Census of Population 2016
Figure 12: Download speed availability in megabits per second, urban versus rural (percentage of homes)
Download speed in megabits per second (mbps) |
Percentage of urban homes with availability |
Percentage of rural homes with availability |
Projected percentage of rural homes that would have access by the end of 2017 |
---|---|---|---|
1.5 mbps |
100 |
93 |
|
5 mbps |
100 |
87 |
|
10 mbps |
100 |
75 |
|
25 mbps |
100 |
60 |
|
50 mbps |
98 |
41 |
54 |
100 mbps |
98 |
37 |
|
Figure 13: Ownership of infrastructure by asset type, 2016
Asset type |
Percentage owned by provinces, territories and regions |
Percentage owned by urban municipalities |
Percentage owned by rural municipalities |
---|---|---|---|
Solid waste sites |
22 |
28 |
50 |
Potable water sites |
16 |
39 |
45 |
Wastewater sites |
9 |
53 |
38 |
Roads |
32 |
32 |
36 |
Tunnels |
40 |
30 |
30 |
Storm water pipes |
3 |
70 |
27 |
Culture, recreation and sport facilities |
2 |
75 |
23 |
Potable water pipes |
10 |
67 |
23 |
Bridges |
56 |
25 |
19 |
Wastewater pipes |
12 |
70 |
18 |
Storm water sites |
13 |
80 |
7 |
Social housing |
77 |
20 |
3 |
Public transit rolling stock |
16 |
83 |
1 |
Source: Statistics Canada, Canada’s Core Public Infrastructure Survey, 2016
Figure 14: Share of new assets built in 2016 by asset type
Asset Owner Type |
Percentage of new roads built |
Percentage of new bridges built |
Percentage of new tunnels built |
---|---|---|---|
Provinces, territories and regions |
16% |
33 |
37 |
Urban municipalities |
25% |
11 |
14 |
Rural municipalities |
59% |
57 |
49 |
Source: Statistics Canada, Canada’s Core Public Infrastructure Survey, 2016
Figure 15 – Prevalence of asset management plans by owner type
Asset owner |
Percentage with Asset Management Plans |
---|---|
Provinces, territories and regions |
27.3 |
Urban municipalities |
48.5 |
Rural municipalities |
46.6 |
Source: Statistics Canada, Canada’s Core Public Infrastructure Survey, 2016
- Date modified: